Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Brom MkLeith
Epsilon Inc STORM.
14
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 19:18:00 -
[1] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:I, and a significant amount of the people I know, would probably quit, or draw down our account numbers to at best one per player. It really depends on how much things change
If changes are limited in scope to what has been proposed so far, we'd retaliate by significantly upping the amount of infiltration and in-corp griefing activities to ensure that the amount of accounts CCP loses from our activities completely overshadows the amount of accounts CCP loses from our own unsubscriptions. We'd do everything possible, and within allowed game mechanics, to collect carebear and CCP tears
If CCP makes high-sec completely nonconductive to nonconsensual player interaction, then most of us would flat-out quit. There would be nothing left for us in this game.
It's a shame that the only thing in this game for you is for you to be able to gank people. It's a chickenshit tactic requiring little skill or bravery and it harms the general player base. People crying about the POSSIBILITY of removing non-consensual pvp from HIGH SEC sound like the punk bully who gets his lawyer Daddy to sue the school because they put him in time out for smacking other kids in the head
I don't want the bully killed. I just want to be able to fight back without the teacher taking away everything that I use to protect myself with. If you give the bully a baseball bat then let me have one as well.
Don't remove Non-consensual PVP but make it so it's not soooooo damned cheap and chicken **** to do. |

Brom MkLeith
Epsilon Inc STORM.
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 19:28:00 -
[2] - Quote
Roxwar wrote:The only ones quitting due to removing high sec PVP are the pussies who lack the balls to go to the places CCP provide for PVP, you may have heard of low sec and null sec, thats where most PVP players get their rocks off, and not hiding behind concord protection while they cherry pick their targets to dec knowing full well they outclass them in every way for guarenteed easy kills..
People just mad they wont be able to buff their KB with easy kills against non PVP players in high sec who dont know how to shoot back and will be forced to come to low/null and fight other - oh my gosh - PVP'ers who actually can and will shoot you back to the point you return to high sec with your carebear tail between your legs, and eventually - fingers crossed - quit EVE.
TLDR - Cry moar and jog on.
Amen brother! |

Brom MkLeith
Epsilon Inc STORM.
15
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 19:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Carebears Control Playerbase wrote:Brom MkLeith wrote:[quote=Destiny Corrupted]I, and a significant amount of the people I know, would probably quit, or draw down our account numbers to at best one per player. It really depends on how much things change Fail quote
Thanks for pointing out that I dropped that Bracket on the way to the Post button. :)
|

Brom MkLeith
Epsilon Inc STORM.
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 21:03:00 -
[4] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Brom MkLeith wrote:[quote=Destiny Corrupted] It's a shame that the only thing in this game for you is for you to be able to gank people. It's a chickenshit tactic requiring little skill or bravery and it harms the general player base. People crying about the POSSIBILITY of removing non-consensual pvp from HIGH SEC sound like the punk bully who gets his lawyer Daddy to sue the school because they put him in time out for smacking other kids in the head
I don't want the bully killed. I just want to be able to fight back without the teacher taking away everything that I use to protect myself with. If you give the bully a baseball bat then let me have one as well.
Don't remove Non-consensual PVP but make it so it's not soooooo damned cheap and chicken **** to do. You say you don't want the teacher taking away everything that you use to protect yourself with, but in reality, by supporting this change you're simply asking the teacher to allow you to bring your dad to school so he can beat up that bully.
Right, I don't support removing non-consensual PVP. I even said that in my post. But I don't want to have my methods of defense constantly nerfed and the gankers given bigger clubs. Why should a ganker only have to spend 10mil isk on a ship that can take down a 200mil isk ship in under 15 seconds? The douchebags can not be the only face presented by EvE if this game wants to grow. "Oook ook! This is a sand box. Blah blah blah." They want a sandbox where they can't get sand thrown back in their faces. The gankers gameplay tactics have been completely safe and without risk in the past. We'll see what the "Inferno" really brings to the table.
|

Brom MkLeith
Epsilon Inc STORM.
18
|
Posted - 2012.04.25 21:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Mith'riin wrote:PvP to Highsec pirates YAARRRRRR = Can flip, suicide ganking exhumers/mining barges/that idiot in a 2b pimped tengu/that guy with an industrial in autopilot.
Get real for one time in your life, go to 0.0 and live/die there. Then you can talk about pvp and go QQQQQQ. 90% of the "Highsec" PvP players do it for griefing or iskies (And then you complain about isk/h on some aspects of the game). I'm sorry for the legit 10% that just wanted to pewpew in 1v1 duels.
Edit: Besides all of that. You NEED new players in the game. You remember me of the high level players in Lineage 2 pking all the lowbies. You NEED the game to keep getting players, else, you will end playing alone, spinning your ship in the station. Good and succesfull MMO need to catter to a wide audience. You are like the little underground emo teenagers that stop listeting to a good band because it was made "Commercial"
LOL. Nicely put. EvE can not continue to present the face of the douchebag who laughs when a new player has a hard time figuring something out. |
|
|